-
-
Never reply with "I love you too".
Here I am, thinking I'm so profound for seeing it, but apparently it's a common piece of relationship advice, so there's no need to elaborate. -
Everything is sexism when you are dumb enough.
Recently I discovered they believe the old adage, "there are no girls on the internet," is sexist. Let's figure it out.
It must be obvious it doesn't discriminate intrinsically. The internet is not somewhere every good person must end up in. But even if you feel otherwise, it's fine. Even when something looks intrinsically discriminatory, like "there are no negros in heaven," context ultimately defines its nature.
So how was "there are no girls on the internet" used? Was it something to be celebrated? No. According to what I saw, even they who labeled it sexist had to admit it was a word of caution. The internet users would have loved to communicate with the females and not with the impersonating trolls and perverts. How the heck was that discriminatory toward the females? "Be careful! There are no honest traders in this market"—is that discriminatory toward the honest traders? Quite the opposite: it elevates honest traders, makes it harder for the impersonators to stain their reputation, and inflates their value through real or perceived scarcity.
The irony is, they prolly think calling everything under the sun sexist/racist/etc is a good thing, that it spreads awareness and solves those problems. I wonder if it's actually the other way around. It's functionally equivalent to "X are bad no matter what!" How would that ever dissipate hatred and not fuel it? Or was it always the real goal?
Retardation will destroy everything unless we destroy it first. -
Sleepy melancholy.
-
Usually it's either trolls or humans who are both retarded and untempered by wars who say shit like "war is hell".
Some humans might be borderline retarded and not see the issue immediately, but still deserving and capable of a realization, so here's a hint:
"Suicides are awful."
"Domestic abuse is torment."
"Raping newborns is a nasty thing."
Get it? No, wait. It's even worse.
While the examples above hopefully clearly demonstrate how a malformed virtue signaling can shelter a culprit and put you in a resigned matter-of-fact mood, "war is hell", in addition to those things, romanticizes war with poetic language and obscures far more complexity and nuance. War can be the best solution to a problem. It may be the only solution. At risk of sounding banal, what other easy-to-implement and sure-to-work solutions were there for the Third Reich? In times when they should've been invested, their obnoxious "war is hell" cries would have done real damage. -
Ah. It's the soil pipe leakage anniversary.
Let's see what cute girls think of the soil pipe state on the occasion.
-
Why are the liberals so fucking disgusting?
It has nothing to do with Democrats or Republicans. They might not be the least intelligent group of people either.
Here's one thing: the appalling discordance between how open-minded they see themselves and how pathologically intolerant they are of any opinion in the slightest different from theirs or any data incongruous with their worldview. I know from experience it's extremely difficult to be friends with a libtard. You never know what piece of information will cause their next mental breakdown and a desperate attempt to make you feel like a terrible person. "Smoking is bad for your health"? "I'd be reluctant to marry a prostitute"? "Filipinos are relatively small"?
A libtard is like the opposite of a libertarian, who's typically unbothered by facts or other people's affairs, and it's funny how they share the same root.
Spare yourself the pain and test a person for libtardation before trying to get close with them.
Another revolting flaw is, of course, what a non-libtarded person would usually consider complicity in wrongdoing or enabling of evil, and the stark contrast between it and how righteous they see themselves. Whether it's something trivial, like a murder, or something consequential, like a military invasion, they always seem to take the aggressor's side, with the rare exception when the victim's skin color's much darker than the aggressor's. They won't necessarily claim something like "Terrorism is great!" directly, but they will surely preach the idea that the terrorists are innocent and must be supported.
"No way!" you may say. "Those are far-left extremists, not liberals!" If that's so, then half of the American youth today must be far-left extremists.
Feb 27, 2026
They may seem largely harmless *now*, but how many of the retarded American youngsters you reckon will sabotage their own country or support its adversaries when a Sino-American war, over Taiwan or otherwise, comes to fruition? [1]
Make no mistake, they *will* side with China over Taiwan or its allies, at least until rockets rain down on their heads and cure them of libtardation. To a liberal, there's something as important as skin color when it comes to whom to support—it's who abhors the United States more. They are predisposed to virtually anything—from Arabic to communism, from Tolstoevsky to Uyghur reeducation camps—anything that, in their mind, faintly echoes with "murica bad!... murica bad!..." They may still show some distaste for Putin and whatnot, because he's a homophobe or some shit, but that's always superficial. They may dislike the CEO of degeneracy, but they love the degeneracy itself with all their heart.
When you see a mindless mob of internet users harassing strangers who don't share their peculiar views—that it's *racist* to help Ukraine neutralize russians, that it's *virtuous* to assault Jewish business owners in the US—and all of them have pronouns, anthropomorphic wolves, and flags of nonexistent countries on display, you can be damn sure those are Americans.
What's wrong with the American youth? You never see this overwhelming flood of retardation coming from North/West Europeans, even though they speak the same language and share a lot of culture. If you use the right queries, so that ChatGPT doesn't respond like a triggered liberal itself, you can dig pretty deep on the various reasons. There are, for example, political tribalism, failed experiments in education, and foreign actors.
God bless America, and godspeed. What else can I say? You *don't want* the world to be run by the present-day Chinese.
I am not claiming liberal youth will become the most destructive force to America in a war. Indeed it is possible, even probable, that the "America first" retards will do more damage. I just had to cover it in the scope of the "why are the libs so unpleasant to be near with" discussion.
---
[1] If the kind of people we talk about were to read it, they'd surely say China's invasion of Taiwan is a blatant piece of Sinophobic propaganda. It's their yet another unpleasant quality—to deny something even when the group they are trying to protect proudly admits it. China *brags* about their Taiwan-taking capabilities. The use of force on Taiwan is formally allowed in their freaking law. Their training drills simulating the invasion increase in scale and frequency.
Knowing everything that I know now, I estimate that it's *likely* that China invades Taiwan in the coming years. It may not be their very next military campaign, and it won't necessarily happen in 2027 like the analysts predict, but let's say the probability of it happening in the next 5 years is about 77%.
*If* that happens, I estimate that it's *probable* that the United States responds militarily, despite Donald Trump's attempts to play isolationism. Let's say it's about 67%.
Don't wet your pants just yet. *If* both events happen, I estimate that it's *very unlikely* that it escalates to a full-blown, total war. Neither Americans nor the Chinese are as irrational (or as passionate in their hatred) as the russian retards are—neither will mobilize the resources of their entire country in an attempt to capture (or destroy) some relatively small piece of foreign land. -
https://femtanyl.bandcamp.com/album/chaser
My taste in music is degrading I'm afraid. I enjoyed something enjoyed predominantly by the furrytrash gender-fluid bestiality-inclined ugly-drawing (and the visual taste is surely correlated tightly with the auditory one), and while it's not immediately obvious from the looks of it, through experience I know they're the holders of the most dumbass political views (and intelligence is surely correlated tightly with the sense of aesthetics).
I can already hear some barely conscious mad lib uttering the phrase they were conditioned to react with: "Bigoted much? Who cares? Just enjoy!" I care. Why go through life sleepwalking when there are so many fascinating patterns to study. And I do enjoy. But when you enjoy eating dung and cannot rationalize why it's good or bad, you better mute your factory settings for a moment and think of other ways to evaluate your life choices. It's not always racist to use that tiny little brain of yours.
Apr 19, 2026
I apologize for my ignorance. 'Twas brought to my attention the author's transgender. It's only expected they'd be followed by throngs of neurodiverse kids. It all checks out now. It's because genitals, not because the music's good or bad.
