• You know how, in our culture, there is an overused scene where a parent is dissatisfied with their kid’s bad grades?

    “But mommy, little Timmy got an ever worse grade!”

    “I don’t care what your little Timmy has! An A is not good enough! Little Susan has an A-plus! Why can’t you be like little Susan? Talk to me when you have an A-plus!”

    “I HATECHOO!!” screams the kid, with a little creak in his little voice. He runs away and, with a loud BANG, closes the door to his room.

    I am honestly tired of these cliche relationships. Do humans act like that often? I don’t remember anything similar in my life.

    But I will never forget the opposite treatment.

    When I had a suboptimal exam result, around 83%, I phoned my private tutor to tell him the bad news.

    “Hey, I just call to tell you my exam result like you asked… I’ve got 83%.”

    “Phew! Really? Wow, I am so glad for you! You worked hard and totally earned it. Well done!”

    I tried to mirror my tutor’s seemingly genuine joy. But at that moment I knew: all along, I was taken for garbage that was unlikely to achieve anything greater.

    Why don’t we see THAT in our movies, TV series, or books? It can be a neat part of a villain arc.

    Don’t worry. I myself am too apathetic, lazy, introverted, and infantile to be a worthwhile villain.

  • That guy NFKRZ poisons people’s minds again I see.

    “Pro-Ukraine HATE me!!”

    Manipulative language. Sadly, low-intelligence people buy it and turn hostile to pro-Ukraine.

    NFKRZ is a type of propagandist I feared many russians would become. Who don’t swear, outright lie, threaten, praise terrorism, etc.

    Who pretend civilized and use subtle ways to influence other people.

    I feared needlessly. We are very lucky most of them are so fucking stupid.

  • I feel sorry for Japan. It’s one of the most advanced countries. But it lures the most degenerate foreigners. Both real-life experience and online presence make it obvious.

    Unintelligent weeb + failure in life + plays videogames all day
    = wants to live in Japan.

    Unintelligent weeb + failure in life + loud + irritating narcissist
    = wants to live in Japan.

    Unintelligent weeb + failure in life + smells + socially awkward
    = wants to live in Japan.

    If you watch closely, trolls and brainrots of the internet use anime profile pictures disproportionally often. And sometimes I notice that they have traveled or relocated to Japan.

    Your mileage may vary. But, according to what many other people say, it won’t. Their experience confirms the trend.

    Japanese are lucky to have a rather difficult language. It creates some barrier. It filters at least those degenerates who aren’t persistent enough.

  • I hate the quotation marks. More precisely, I hate it when they are used to sneak in the author’s negative opinion about something. This is often abused by the low-quality journos and is revolting. It immediately shows me that the author is retarded, or targets a retarded audience, or both. Let me explain.

    Suppose you want to say that Navalny called to bomb Tbilisi. You can write just so: Navalny called to bomb Tbilisi. However, if a low-quality journo wants to demonstrate that this is a bad or ridiculous thing for Navalny to do, they may use the quotation marks: Navalny called to “bomb” Tbilisi.

    Not all quotes are bad. Let’s refer to the type of quotes we criticize here as the “degenerate quotes.” Notice, for example, that the quotes used in the previous sentence are not the degenerate quotes. They were not used to demonstrate something said by a person whom I disagree with. Instead, they simply helped to understand that some new entity was introduced.

    I am not saying that you must not include your opinion in your writing. I am not suggesting to remain neutral at all times. Calling to bomb Tbilisi is a terrible thing, and suppose you want to convey that. How do you convey that in our example sentence, “Navalny called to bomb Tbilisi”? The best solution is that you don’t. You can make your opinion obvious from the context. You don’t need to hold your reader’s hand and lead them along every little step like they are some child with disabilities. Don’t take your readers for idiots, unless you specifically write for that audience.

    Not surprisingly, the degenerate quotes are often used by the russians. Let’s see an example:

    “In various statements, he called for dividing Brazil into 4 parts, Armenia joining NATO, bombing Belgrade with NATO forces, dividing the BRICS countries, ‘decolonizing’ Russia and China, dismembering Israel…”

    Notice the contrast: none of the actions the person called for were enclosed in quotes apart from the decolonizing of russia and China, which our retarded russian author tried to present as bad or ridiculous. In the context of russian propaganda, this is reasonable. Its power lies in passion and quantity, not in quality. And its target audience is not the smartest half of humanity, of course.

    There are situations, however, when the degenerate quotes are seemingly impossible to avoid. Here is an example:

    “As a race, Night Elves are typically honorable and just, but they are very distrusting of the ‘lesser races’ of the world.”

    These may be hard to call the degenerate quotes even. First, they did not enclose something that was said, but rather something that was thought. Second, if we omit the quotes here, the meaning of the message will change: it will imply there are indeed some lesser races that the Night Elves distrust. Still, these quotes add the same bad aftertaste that the degenerate quotes usually do. So in this situation, I still advocate removing the quotes and rephrasing the sentence to retain its original meaning:

    “As a race, Night Elves are typically honorable and just, but they are very distrusting of whom they consider the lesser races of the world.”

    Oh my gosh, this is so much better. I no longer feel the amateur author trying to spit their opinion in my face, while I may still understand it from a broader context.

    Okay now, I know that I may have used the degenerate quotes here and there, and I may use them again in the future. But I am an amateur author, and sometimes I write for an amateur reader. But, most importantly, THIS IS MY WORLD, so I can do whatever the heck I want. The degenerate quotes are most nauseating when they are used in a “professional” context, such as in media articles or Wikipedia pages.

  • “Polish Foreign Minister @sikorskiradek says that the US has “very decisively” informed Russia that it will use conventional weapons “to destroy any Russian target in the occupied territories of Ukraine” if Russia launches a nuclear strike against Ukraine.”

    Some Ukrainians are mad and think it is not enough, but that’s an ideal strategy really. It renders nukes useless for the goal of capturing even the tiniest piece of Ukraine. It also ensures that there is no worldwide nuclear holocaust. A balance between safety and international law enforcement.

    Honestly, we can be happy the world is at least this just for Ukraine. If India nukes Pakistan, no one would give a fig.

    But there are other aspects at play. Will russia believe US/Europe after they failed on so many promises? Will US/Europe not fail when it comes to nukes?

  • ChatGPT just can’t stop delivering.

    “The claim that Novgorod was the capital of Rus’ is not supported by historical evidence. Moscow has been known to promote narratives that enhance its historical significance, but in the case of Novgorod, historical records consistently identify Kiev as the primary capital of Kievan Rus’, the early Slavic state from which Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus trace their cultural origins. Novgorod was indeed a significant medieval city and a major political and economic center, but it was never the capital of Kievan Rus’. The notion that Novgorod might have been presented as a capital in a disinformation campaign by Moscow lacks substantial evidence and is not commonly supported in historical scholarship.”

    I wish it learned that Belarus does not in fact mean “white r*ssia.” Unfortunately, Belarusians aren’t very interested in protecting their history and never wrote a single article explaining how manipulative this foul narrative is.

    Maybe it just caters to my expectations to foster me into an obedient AI slave? I don’t mind.

    Ask it if the story of Novgorod once being the capital of Rus’ was a disinformation campaign from Moscow. Let me know if it provides you with a different answer.

  • Funny how Western russophiles infest replies with their desperate tears every time you mention russian casualties. But the actual russains don’t care: they know the real casualty rate might be even higher and that’s fine with them.

    Besides, while 500,000 terrorists were neutralized, another 1,500,000 terrorists were born.

    The lack of cannon fodder is basically a nonexistent issue for russia at this point, sadly. The attempts of braindead freethinkers to shift the narrative are thus even more pathetic.

    But aren’t those braindead freethinkers just russian trolls in disguise?

    Some of them actually may be, but most of the time it is pretty easy to distinguish between a Muscovite trying to speak English and a contrarian MAGA truck driver from the US.

  • I hate people like this. (Well, not really. It’s just an expression.)

    The kind of people who don’t see the 95% of good a person does and instead attack them for the 5% of bad, potentially pushing them away.

    The “shoot yourself in the foot” kind of people.

    Michael McFaul does tremendous work for Ukraine, while his love for fake russian opposition does little harm.

    Another example is Poland, which demonstrated amazing support for Ukraine but was *disproportionally* attacked for the acts of a tiny minority of farmtards.

    While it is totally reasonable to constructively criticize certain behavior (and I do it all the time), attacking a person or a country that does more good than bad as a whole is incredibly dumb.

    Stop shooting yourself in the foot!

  • It’s a start of the “poetic fortnight!”

    For 14 days in a row, I commit myself to composing… something that might resemble poetry. Considering my current absence of talent, skill, and even English fluency, I expect it to produce some absolute garbage. And I am happy with that. I would love to see streams of consciousness and incoherent nonsense, a la “colorless green ideas sleep furiously.” But I shall not fall into the pit where the wretched intersperse their prose with newlines and call it poetry. My poems can be tiny, they can be awful by all measures, but they must have a meter and a rhyme. I am fond of different types of constrained writing, but for now, those are the rules.

    1. Gory Fluids

    Double down, triple up,
    Hitherto we quickly going!
    Where the head was ripped apart,
    Gory fluids overflowing.

    1. We Bore

    Deep into the planet’s core,
    Where the spacious caverns glooming,
    Where the dwarves their fungi pruning,
    Where no human’s been before,
    Into darkness that we bore.

    1. DragonFire

    No technology aspire
    For the progress, more or less,
    As the British DragonFire
    With its lasers of finesse.

    1. Moist Cell

    In the darkest corner of the moist cell,
    In which I was locked by shady creatures,
    There were copses there, they had foul smell,
    Maggots ate away their facial features.

    1. Heat Fan

    I do not care, I do not see
    Why people get so stressed.
    They have a home, they are so blest
    To eat and have a rest.

    You better not go outside,
    Unless you want to die
    A painful death beneath green sky
    While tissues mortify.

    But if I die below the ground,
    I die a happy man.
    For no one had a better spot
    Than me, below heat fan.

    For when I shut my weary eyes,
    I see an ocean shore.
    I’ve never been on shore before,
    Before the mushroom war.

    1. Christianity

    You may not know, the tablet had
    A lost, forgotten shard.
    You must not kill no humans, lad,
    Unless it’s a libtard.

    1. Disobey

    When you are talked to at the store,
    Be sure to just ignore.
    When someone’s knocking on the door,
    Go lie down on the floor.

    When life gives you lemons, you throw them away.
    You keep every contact at bay.
    The universe’s going to put in your way
    Your fate, but you must disobey.

    1. Little Butterfly

    Be free, oh little butterfly!
    No longer shall you cry.
    You do, however, owe me thy
    Blue wings, the color of the sky.

    1. Another Leisure Day

    Every Sunday I’ve been yearning
    For another leisure day.
    Yet I must be brightly burning,
    As some people daresay.
    Wasted time is not returning.
    Life is not a holiday.

    1. Testament

    When I am dead, don’t bury me.
    Don’t waste a single dime.
    Don’t waste your time on rituals
    Of faiths that aren’t mine.

    My faith is called “efficiency”;
    It gladdens God on high.
    So when I die, just use the corpse
    To nourish your pigsty.

    1. Phil

    From a tinkle to a clang
    Sounds rise up high, and still
    Through the suffering and pain
    I can hear the voice of Phil.

    1. Boomer

    Sixty years that fucking boomer
    Lived and laughed and slept and fucked.
    We were not in a good humor.
    His demise was quite abrupt.

    1. Indifferent

    Thou could not see how the coffin
    Of thy Father caved in;
    How thy natal star was shining,
    Brighter than has ever been.

    Heavy clouds were so solemn,
    And the skies have cried all night.
    Northern wolves thy corpse protected
    From the lesser creatures’ bite.

    Orphan boy, thou lived in torment,
    But at last, thy journey ends.
    Thus thou died, forever thinking
    that thy world’s indifferent.

    1. Demiurge

    Before there was a single thing,
    There were no things at all.
    The engine of the universe
    Was put into a stall.

    But long before there was no time,
    Before there was no space,
    There was a man called Demiurge;
    He had a lonesome face.

    Retrospect.

    I am glad that the poetic fortnight ended. But I am even more glad that it happened. Honestly, I am proud of my little creations.

    Composing poetry is doable, but not easy. Like with any of my writing, I used a dictionary extensively. I used a tool for checking grammar and consulted ChatGPT on the intricacies of different words and constructions. Additionally, I used a tool that helped me to find rhymes. I was to the poets of the past what a malformed baby on life support is to the able-bodied adults.

    However, the most difficult part of the process was not even connected with writing. The most difficult part was finding motivation, inspiration, determination, time, energy, and focus to actually sit down, concentrate, and compose. The necessity and struggle to find those things feels like a curse.

    The process of composing poetry revealed several interesting things.

    1. Initially, I thought that writing chaotic nonsensical stuff would be easy and fun and that it would produce beautifully profound pieces. I drew parallels with abstract expressionism in painting and noise in music. In reality, the path of the least resistance was often the path that was logical and coherent and made sense. It is quite difficult to compose nonsense and not look mediocre, childishly inept even. The results of such attempts feel shallow. It immediately looks as if the author chose the words based on their small vocabulary and inability to find another rhyme.

    2. One can assume that the creation of poetry starts with an idea, with a clear picture of a world or a scene that you want to describe. And then, that phantom is carefully filled with fitting words. It did not work like that for me. Instead, I started with the words. I played with random words and phrases that came to my mind. Then I tried to fit more. It was an iterative process. For sure, I dictated some general mood, and it always ended up how I liked it most. But it was the words that were leading the details of the narrative, not the other way around.

    3. It may be tempting to elevate the author and think that a poem (or any other piece of writing) is just a narrow slice of the vast and rich world which they imagined in their mind. In various reviews, we often see how people try to answer the question: “What did the author mean?” However, while I was composing, I was firmly pulled in the opposite direction. I believe that the author’s mind is just a narrow slice of their creation. And it doesn’t matter much what the author was trying to tell. For all we know, the author might have been a wild monkey mindlessly tapping on a keyboard, and it just so happened that the characters aligned into something that we can grasp mentally and interpret. We interact with the text, not with the author. The author is irrelevant. Instead of asking, “What did the author mean?” it is a lot more interesting to think, “What hidden depths can these words contain?” Instead of thinking what the author tried to tell, we are free to explore the vast and rich worlds ourselves, and it is so much fun.

    So for me, in a sense, it is as engaging to explore my own poems as to explore the ones created by other authors. I can take one of them, forget what I was thinking about at the time of its creation, and interpret it to my liking. Let’s take the “Indifferent” as an example. What scene did I imagine when I was writing it? It does not matter. But considering all the clues and the atmosphere, it is likely that the hero’s death took place deep inside a boreal forest. What historical period was it? Once again, we can speculate and imagine the world in which it happened. The use of the older “thou” and “thy,” the stylistic capitalization of “Father,” the rickety coffins deep in the ground, the need for a solitary journey through the woods, and the presence of orphans all hint it could be a world roughly corresponding to our medieval times.

    A piece of text, even this small, encompasses both a myriad of specific minute details and a vagueness of a plausible infinite universe. That’s a lot more than a human author could have imagined.